FTC bans provider of cash advances to industry traders – Consumer Protection


United States: FTC bans provider of cash advances to industry traders

To print this article, simply register or connect to Mondaq.com.

On January 5, the FTC announcement that two defendants will be permanently banned from the cash advance and debt collection industries, and will have to pay $ 675,000 to resolve allegations that they used deceptive and illegal means to seize the assets of small businesses, organizations and nonprofit and religious organizations. The order stems from a 2020 lawsuit against two New York-based companies engaged in small business financing, as well as several of their owners and executives.

The FTC notes that merchant cash advances are a type of alternative financing for small businesses where merchant cash advances companies provide funds to businesses in exchange for a percentage of the businesses’ income. Typically, a merchant cash advance company will make daily withdrawals from the company’s bank account until the obligation is fulfilled. However, the original The complaint alleged that the defendants violated FTC law for engaging in deceptive and unfair practices, including distorting the terms of their cash advances to merchants, using unfair collection practices and making unauthorized withdrawals. consumer accounts. the amended The complaint alleges that the defendants also violated the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act’s prohibition on using false statements to obtain financial information from consumers, including bank account numbers, login credentials and identity authorized signatories, in order to “withdraw more than the specified amount from consumer bank accounts.” “

The FTC’s case against three other defendants is ongoing, and the proposed order requires the settling defendants to cooperate with the FTC.

Put into practice : This FTC action is consistent with that of the FTC continued focus in recent years on small business finance, and serves as a reminder to participants in the cash advance space to monitor their compliance with federal and state unfair and deceptive practices laws and other regulations to ensure full and proper compliance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide on the subject. Specialist advice should be sought regarding your particular situation.

POPULAR ARTICLES ON: US Consumer Protection

CFPB publishes final Libor transition rules

Holland and knight

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the Bureau) has issued a Final Regulations to facilitate the transition from Libor (the London Interbank Offered Rate) …

Review of the year 2021: CCPA litigation

Squire Patton Boggs LLP

2021 was another banner year for the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). Read on for CPW’s highlights on the year’s most important CCPA litigation events, plus our forecast …


About Author

Comments are closed.